I must admit that I found the plan of the book rather confusing, and there is a certain amount of repetition. Some long sections, for example on nineteenth century diplomatic life and work patterns in Chapter 5, also tend to take a sledge hammer to crack a nut, and have too many quotations for my taste. In addition, there are some odd failings of language, two of them occurring in the opening paragraph of Chapter 3, at which point the attention of the Harvard UP copy editor must have been on something else. (‘In the autumn of 1861, public opinion [morale?] in the northern part of the United States had reached a low ebb. … Foreign exhaltation [exhultation?] at Southern excesses added insult to injury.’) Another weakness is the absence of a Selected Bibliography, with the result that one has to sift the copious footnotes to identify the most important secondary sources. Nevertheless, excepting the first, these are not serious criticisms and should not dissuade those interested in the evolution of diplomatic method over the last two centuries from poring over this book, which is full of interesting facts and suggestive hypotheses.
The result of the introduction of the electric telegraph in the middle of the nineteenth century was that thereafter diplomatic messages were much more quickly received. This is what everyone knows and the point is duly emphasised by Nickles. What is less well known beyond the ranks of the specialists, however, is that ‘cablegrams’ by no means arrived with the speed of light, were hopelessly insecure, and often quite incredibly expensive – especially if they had to be transmitted by submarine cables, as for example between Britain and America and Britain and France. Because of their expense and the need for laborious encoding, messages sent in this manner were also sparser in their language and shorter on information than the older, hand-delivered despatch. For a variety of reasons, which Nickles explains fully, they were also much more often garbled. Nevertheless, suggestive of modernity and exciting events, prestige attached to them. What were the results? Among those to do with diplomacy (as opposed to signals intelligence) two stand out. The first is the declining autonomy of diplomatic envoys in the late nineteenth century. This is the conventional wisdom but Nickles is careful to point out that this varied from state to state, and within the diplomatic services of the same state from envoy to envoy: the limitations of cablegrams, he demonstrates, ‘furnished independently minded diplomats with means to subvert their instructions and maintain their freedom of action’ (p. 31). The second consequence of the attributes of the cablegram, and according to Nickles ‘perhaps most important’, was that while (he hints) it had a benign influence on routine diplomacy, it contributed to ‘the accelerated speed of international crises’. This was serious because ‘[t]he faster pace of diplomatic disputes invited more emotional and less creative decisions on the part of statesmen, while public opinion, which sometimes moderates over the course of a long crisis, often exercised a belligerent influence on shorter crises’ (p. 191). This is inherently plausible and, in light of Nickles’ examples, historically persuasive, though no doubt diplomatic historians will argue furiously over it. I look forward to reading Thomas Otte’s review of this book, which is to be published in the European History Quarterly.
One final point: Nickles describes how the initial astonishment of politicians and journalists at the technical achievement of electric telegraphy led to much naive and ill-considered mid-century speculation that it promised the demise of the diplomatic service altogether. Of course, this did not happen, and prognoses of this sort diminished in the later decades of the nineteenth century (pp. 46-7). It is a pity that this was not recalled in the later years of the twentieth century, when a similar degree of intoxication was produced by jet aircraft and computer communication and produced exactly the same kind of rash predictions.
Related resources
FDR’s Ambassadors and the Diplomacy of Crisis: From the rise of Hitler to the end of World War II
24 Aug, 2013
Tilkidom and the Ottoman Empire: The Letters of Gerald Fitzmaurice to George Lloyd, 1906-15
08 Aug, 2008
A Diplomatic Whistleblower in the Victorian Era
06 Aug, 2015
Munitions of the Mind: A history of propaganda from the ancient world to the present era
03 Aug, 2003
History and the evolution of diplomacy
06 Aug, 1998
Diplomacy and Secret Service
10 Aug, 2019
Peacemaking 1919
09 Aug, 1933
Beyond diplomatic – the unravelling of history
04 Aug, 2002
Just a Diplomat
17 Dec, 2008
The ‘Working’ Non-Aligned Movement: Between Belgrade, Cairo, and Baku – The NAM’s Leadership Visibility
07 Aug, 2020
Genghis Khan and the Making of the Modern World
13 Aug, 2004
The Diplomats, 1939-1979
12 Aug, 1994
The Breaking of Nations
19 Apr, 2006
The History of Diplomatic Immunity
20 Aug, 1999
Lord Elgin and the Marbles
14 Aug, 1998
The British Interests Section in Kampala, 1976-7
16 Aug, 2012
The Ambassadors and America’s Soviet Policy
08 Aug, 1997
The evolution of diplomacy in the Caribbean
02 Aug, 2013
The Imperial Component in Iran’s Foreign Policy: Towards Arab Mashreq and Arab Gulf States
19 Aug, 2011
Misunderstood: The IT manager’s lament
06 Aug, 2004
Nation, Class, and Diplomacy: The dragomanate of the British embassy in Constantinople, 1814-1914
15 Aug, 2008
The Forgotten French
01 Aug, 2003
Philosophy of Rhetoric
07 Aug, 1868
The Rise of Modern Diplomacy, 1450-1919
13 Aug, 1993
Regionalism in the Post-Cold War World
11 Aug, 2000
The Diplomats, 1919-1939
11 Aug, 1994
British Envoys to Germany 1816-1866
09 Nov, 2006
A Diplomat in Japan
04 Aug, 1921
The Professional Diplomat
21 Aug, 1969
Politics and Diplomacy in Early Modern Italy: The structure of diplomatic practice, 1450-1800
26 Apr, 2007
The languages of the Knights
17 Aug, 2001
The British Diplomatic Service 1815-1914
04 Aug, 1983
Getting Our Way: 500 Years of Adventure and Intrigue: The Inside Story of British Diplomacy
13 Aug, 2011
The Nineteenth Century Foreign Office
06 Aug, 1971
The Evolution of Diplomatic Method
17 Aug, 1977
The Congress of Arras, 1435
25 Aug, 1972
The Summer Capitals of Europe, 1814-1919
03 Aug, 2017
Machiavelli’s Legations
10 Aug, 2001
A Manual of Greek Antiquities
04 Aug, 1895
Public diplomacy: Sunrise of an academic field
15 Aug, 2008
British Diplomacy in Turkey, 1583 to the Present: A Study in the Evolution of the Resident Embassy
04 Aug, 2009
Post Cold War diplomatic training
19 Apr, 2006
A kind of diplomatic incantation: Exchanging British and Japanese diplomats in the Second World War
02 Feb, 2012
The Turkish Embassy Letters
12 Aug, 1994
The Journey of Man: A Genetic Odyssey
01 Aug, 2003
The post-modern state and the world order
11 Aug, 2000
Renaissance Diplomacy and the Reformation
18 Aug, 1989
US Public Diplomacy: A Cold War Success Story?
10 Aug, 2007
The History of Diplomatic Immunity
11 Dec, 1999
Ottoman Diplomacy
06 Aug, 2004
The Expansion of International Society
16 Aug, 1985
Bertie of Thame: Edwardian Ambassador
04 Aug, 1990
Years of Upheaval
20 Aug, 1982
English Medieval Diplomacy
09 Aug, 1985
Diplomacy in Ancient Greece
08 Aug, 1975
The Queen’s Ambassador to the Sultan: Memoirs of Sir Henry A. Layard’s Constantinople Embassy, 1877-1880
10 Mar, 2010
The Office of Ambassador in the Middle Ages
18 Aug, 1967
Japanese middle-power diplomacy
10 Aug, 2012