Twentieth-Century Diplomacy: A Case Study of British Practice, 1963-1976
What is so original about the book is that the author has asked himself: What are the major forms of diplomatic contact? And followed this with the question: How and to what effect were they each employed by one state over a period sufficiently short to make detailed research possible but not so short as to make it impossible to identify trends? Having chosen Britain over the years from 1963 until 1976, he seeks to establish which diplomatic methods were the most useful for which purposes.
Young begins with two contextual chapters. The first provides a succinct overview of the issues confronting British foreign policy in the period, a penetrating – and at times amusing – analysis of how policy was made, and a most useful description of the significant changes in the composition of the diplomatic service during these years. The second chapter is on ‘the diplomatic machine’, which he tackles by examining in turn the three major official post-war reports of which it was the object, which happened to fall more or less within his period: Plowden (1964), Duncan (1969) and Berrill (1977). He rightly praises the first, salvages the second from the mistaken charge that it was inconsequential, and damns the last with faint praise (Berrill made the elementary mistake of failing to recognise that declining military and economic power meant more diplomacy not less). My only reservation about the account of the Duncan Report is its relatively slender treatment of its impact on the commercial priorities of embassies as opposed to the economies which it urged in the diplomatic service itself.
It is with chapter 4, ‘Resident Embassies’, that Professor Young gets into diplomatic method itself, and it is an impressive launch. The role of the British embassy, whether accredited to states or international organizations, did not diminish in either the volume of its work or its importance, he demonstrates; instead, the increase in ministerial visits and multilateral diplomacy simply produced a change in the character of its role. But this varied from embassy to embassy (“There is no ‘typical’ embassy.”) and could vary in the same embassy in just a matter of years. To support and illustrate his theme, he looks in some detail at the work of six ambassadors during these years: David Hunt in Nigeria (1967-9), John Freeman in India (1965-8), Patrick Reilly in Paris (1965-8), Christopher Soames in Paris (1968-72), Lord Caradon at the UN (1964-70), and Michael Palliser at the EC (1973-5). “Their experience confirms that … it was essential to have an efficient, permanent and large diplomatic service”, he concludes, adding interestingly that some of these ambassadors contributed not only to the efficiency with which foreign policy was executed but also to its content.
The chapter on special missions is illustrated with a multitude of examples, especially that of Rhodesia. Here the author demonstrates how such missions multiplied massively during the period, using a host of different kinds of person for a host of different purposes. He rightly concludes that while resident ambassadors sometimes saw special envoys as a threat to their standing as well as a practical nuisance (especially in the case of the much put-upon Washington Embassy), the relationship was symbiotic: each needed the other. The dependence of visiting envoys on their country’s resident embassy is obvious enough but why does the latter sometimes value the former? In light of his research, Young suggests that this is not just because of the specialist knowledge that visitors can bring but because it is easier for an embassy to preserve good relations with the government to which it is accredited if it can pass to the visitor the task of delivering any unpleasant message. This is certainly true but some governments in this period undoubtedly also valued visiting envoys, especially high-ranking ones, because there was no better way of getting the local government’s favourable attention, increasing the embassy’s access, and giving it a peg on which to hang its propaganda work. My own recent research has revealed that during the 1960s the Turkish government felt undervalued by an absence of high-level visitors from Britain, and as a result the British Embassy in Ankara repeatedly begged for more of them in order to improve the bilateral atmosphere and make its own job easier. The author later makes the same point in connection with bilateral summits (p. 140) but many embassies would settle for less!
In dealing with summitry, first bilateral and then multilateral, John Young confirms most of what we already knew about this subject. This is a relief! However, some interesting new points also emerge: summitry may be used to boost the domestic position of a favoured leader; the ‘exchange of views’ category, which I had favoured, is too broad; and at least during this period the telephone conversations between British and other leaders were too trivial to be bracketed with face-to-face summits. State visits are also dealt with at length in a particularly original and interesting chapter. ‘Outward’ visits by the Queen, which totalled 18 over the period, were designed chiefly to promote ‘Great Britain plc’ and were generally thought to be successful, and ‘inward’ visits by foreign heads of state, which came to 26 in all, were designed principally to advertise Britain’s achievements and show what it had to offer. The chapter on this subject brings out how difficult the planning of such visits could be.
The book’s final chapter deals with British diplomatic practice in these years in dealing with unfriendly governments, or at least governments making unfriendly gestures on a narrow front. In particular, it describes how and why Britain brought its policy on recognition into line with the less problematical one of its European partners, shifting from recognising regimes to recognising states; and then followed willingly a path pioneered by the Egyptians and West Germans in the mid-1960s in employing interests sections to preserve diplomatic contact with governments which had severed relations with it as a publicity stunt.
I am full of admiration for this book but no reviewer worthy of the name will pass up the opportunity to point to some sin of omission. So I shall say that it is a pity that Young does not say more about so-called ‘public diplomacy’. This is a pity not because this is now such a wearyingly fashionable subject but because it was roughly at the beginning of his period that the Drogheda Report, which had urged the importance of this in 1953 (it was then known as ‘information work’), first began to be taken seriously. But the author is aware of the gap and in any case does touch on it at more than one place in passing.
What is the general conclusion of the book? Special envoys, bilateral summits and multilateral conferences all increased in number over these years but still left “plenty of room for more traditional forms of diplomatic contact to flourish”. This was not just because each of them met different needs but because each was dependent in some degree on the others. And so does Young convincingly demolish the still widespread assumption that ‘new’ forms of diplomacy are by definition competitors to old ones. His book is not just a sound test of existing general ideas about diplomacy during this period but a model which, if carefully emulated by others, using different states in different periods or different states in the same period, would advance dramatically our understanding of diplomacy.
Related resources
Internet Guide for Diplomats
10 Aug, 2000
The Rise of Modern Diplomacy, 1450-1919
13 Aug, 1993
The Ambassadors and America’s Soviet Policy
08 Aug, 1997
The Turkish Embassy Letters
12 Aug, 1994
A Dictionary of Diplomacy
11 Feb, 2000
Beyond diplomatic – the unravelling of history
04 Aug, 2002
The Foreign Office
11 Aug, 1955
Diplomacy: The world of the honest spy
12 Aug, 1979
The impact of the Internet on diplomatic reporting: how diplomacy training needs to be adjusted to keep pace
23 Aug, 2013
Modern Diplomacy: Dialectics and Dimensions
08 Aug, 1980
The idea of diplomatic culture and its sources
13 Aug, 2004
The Work of Diplomacy
09 Aug, 2002
Pragmatics in diplomatic exchanges
10 Aug, 2001
Diplomacy and the American Democracy
12 Aug, 1988
British Envoys to Germany 1816-1866
09 Nov, 2006
Persuasion in sociology of diplomacy
02 Aug, 2013
Embassies and Foreign Courts
03 Aug, 1856
Diplomacy: Theory and Practice, 4th ed
13 Aug, 2010
Persuasion: bad practices and … others
15 Aug, 2013
A Selection of New diplomatic memoirs
04 Aug, 2000
Reforming Diplomacy: Clear Choices, New Emphases
26 Aug, 2011
Innovation in Diplomatic Practice
12 Aug, 1999
True Brits: Inside the Foreign Office
19 Aug, 1994
Embassies in Armed Conflict
16 Aug, 2012
Getting Our Way: 500 Years of Adventure and Intrigue: The Inside Story of British Diplomacy
13 Aug, 2011
Routledge Handbook of Public Diplomacy
14 Aug, 2008
Diplomat’s Dictionary
07 Aug, 2010
21st Century Diplomacy: A practitioner’s guide
16 Jan, 2012
Language and Diplomacy: Preface
24 Aug, 2001
Multistakeholder diplomacy at the OECD
19 Apr, 2006
A practitioner’s view
04 Aug, 2001
Diplomacy for a Crowded World
13 Aug, 1976
Diplomats as cultural bridge builders
12 Aug, 2004
The Diplomats, 1939-1979
12 Aug, 1994
Positive Diplomacy
06 Aug, 1999
Performance Management in Foreign Ministries: Corporate Techniques in the Diplomatic Service
05 Aug, 2004
English Medieval Diplomacy
09 Aug, 1985
Brian Barder’s Diplomatic Diary
01 Aug, 2019
The Evolution of Diplomatic Method
17 Aug, 1977
The New Diplomacy
02 Aug, 2002
The Professional Diplomat
21 Aug, 1969
The Queen’s Ambassador to the Sultan: Memoirs of Sir Henry A. Layard’s Constantinople Embassy, 1877-1880
10 Mar, 2010
The British Diplomatic Service 1815-1914
04 Aug, 1983
Ever the Diplomat
24 Aug, 2013
The Nineteenth Century Foreign Office
06 Aug, 1971
Manuel de droit diplomatique
11 Aug, 1994
The Office of Ambassador in the Middle Ages
18 Aug, 1967
Cursed is the Peacemaker: The American Diplomat [Philip Habib] Versus the Israeli General, Beirut 1982
09 Aug, 2002
DiploDialogue – Metaphors for Diplomats
30 Aug, 2013
The Diplomats, 1919-1939
11 Aug, 1994
Embassies under Siege
25 Aug, 1995
Reflections on multistakeholder diplomacy
19 Apr, 2006
Satow’s Diplomatic Practice, 6th ed
25 Aug, 2011
Essence of Diplomacy
29 Nov, 2005
Twitter for Diplomats
15 Aug, 2013
Quick Diplomatic Response
10 Aug, 2007
Diplomatic Theory from Machiavelli to Kissinger
12 Aug, 2001
The Consular Dimension of Diplomacy
08 Aug, 1986
FDR’s Ambassadors and the Diplomacy of Crisis: From the rise of Hitler to the end of World War II
24 Aug, 2013
Diplomacy: Theory and Practice, 2nd edn
08 Aug, 2002
Theatre of Power: The Art of Signaling
06 Aug, 1987
The Oxford Handbook of Modern Diplomacy
23 Aug, 2013
I’ll be with you in a Minute Mr. Ambassador: The Education of a canadian Diplomat in Washington
09 Aug, 1991
Persuasion, trust, and personal credibility
10 Aug, 2012
Politics Among Nations
11 Aug, 2005
Diplomacy at the Cutting Edge
12 Aug, 2016
Lessons from two fields
05 Aug, 2004
Diplomacy: Theory and Practice, Fifth Edition
13 Aug, 2015
Japanese middle-power diplomacy
10 Aug, 2012
Just a Diplomat
17 Dec, 2008
International Regimes
13 Aug, 1983
A Dictionary of Diplomacy, Second Edition
14 Aug, 2003
Inside Diplomacy
10 Jul, 2000
The Limits of Neorealism
06 Aug, 2004
Diplomatic culture and its domestic context
13 Aug, 2004
Diplomacy: Theory and Practice, 3rd edn
04 Aug, 2005
The New Diplomacy
16 Aug, 2002
Mediation in International Relations
05 Aug, 1994
A Diplomat in Japan
04 Aug, 1921
Diplomacy: Theory and Practice
12 Aug, 2005
Diplomacy, Satire and the Victorians
01 Aug, 2018
The Practice of Diplomacy, 2nd ed
20 Aug, 2010
21st Century Diplomacy: A Practitioner’s Guide
08 Sep, 2011
Lucky George: Memoirs of an Anti-Politician
29 Sep, 2005
Diplomacy for the New Century
13 Aug, 1998
The School for Ambassadors
11 Aug, 1922
Texts in diplomacy
16 Aug, 2001
The Art of Diplomacy: The American Experience
15 Aug, 1968
The Summer Capitals of Europe, 1814-1919
03 Aug, 2017
Inside Diplomacy
10 Aug, 2000
Diplomatenleben
23 Aug, 2013
Diplomatic Education
10 Aug, 2007
On the manner of practising the new diplomacy
19 Apr, 2006
Public diplomacy: Taxonomies and histories
08 Aug, 2008
John le Carré: The Biography
28 Aug, 2015
The Palgrave Macmillan Dictionary of Diplomacy
17 Aug, 2018
Bilateral Diplomacy
19 Apr, 2007
Renaissance Diplomacy and the Reformation
18 Aug, 1989
Why Persuasion? Reflections after 50 years of practising, teaching and studying diplomacy
09 Aug, 2013
Yes, (Saudi) Minister! A Life in Administration
06 Aug, 1999
The inertia of Diplomacy
07 Aug, 2008
Bertie of Thame: Edwardian Ambassador
04 Aug, 1990
Statecraft
15 Aug, 2008
The Visa Dimension of Diplomacy
06 Aug, 2004
Ottoman Diplomacy
06 Aug, 2004
Language, signaling and diplomacy
10 Aug, 2001
Diplomacy by other means
16 Aug, 2002
How do you know what you think you know?
02 Aug, 2002