Nickles, who is a State Department historian, has written what I believe is the first full-length study of this important and intriguing subject. Excluding an introduction and short conclusion, it has seven chapters presented in three parts (‘Control’, ‘Speed’, and ‘The Medium’), each having a chapter devoted to a case study: the Anglo-American crisis of 1812, the further Anglo-American crisis of 1861 (‘the Trent affair’), and the Zimmerman telegram of January 1917 – which of course also involved the United States.
I must admit that I found the plan of the book rather confusing, and there is a certain amount of repetition. Some long sections, for example on nineteenth century diplomatic life and work patterns in Chapter 5, also tend to take a sledge hammer to crack a nut, and have too many quotations for my taste. In addition, there are some odd failings of language, two of them occurring in the opening paragraph of Chapter 3, at which point the attention of the Harvard UP copy editor must have been on something else. (‘In the autumn of 1861, public opinion [morale?] in the northern part of the United States had reached a low ebb. … Foreign exhaltation [exhultation?] at Southern excesses added insult to injury.’) Another weakness is the absence of a Selected Bibliography, with the result that one has to sift the copious footnotes to identify the most important secondary sources. Nevertheless, excepting the first, these are not serious criticisms and should not dissuade those interested in the evolution of diplomatic method over the last two centuries from poring over this book, which is full of interesting facts and suggestive hypotheses.
The result of the introduction of the electric telegraph in the middle of the nineteenth century was that thereafter diplomatic messages were much more quickly received. This is what everyone knows and the point is duly emphasised by Nickles. What is less well known beyond the ranks of the specialists, however, is that ‘cablegrams’ by no means arrived with the speed of light, were hopelessly insecure, and often quite incredibly expensive – especially if they had to be transmitted by submarine cables, as for example between Britain and America and Britain and France. Because of their expense and the need for laborious encoding, messages sent in this manner were also sparser in their language and shorter on information than the older, hand-delivered despatch. For a variety of reasons, which Nickles explains fully, they were also much more often garbled. Nevertheless, suggestive of modernity and exciting events, prestige attached to them. What were the results? Among those to do with diplomacy (as opposed to signals intelligence) two stand out. The first is the declining autonomy of diplomatic envoys in the late nineteenth century. This is the conventional wisdom but Nickles is careful to point out that this varied from state to state, and within the diplomatic services of the same state from envoy to envoy: the limitations of cablegrams, he demonstrates, ‘furnished independently minded diplomats with means to subvert their instructions and maintain their freedom of action’ (p. 31). The second consequence of the attributes of the cablegram, and according to Nickles ‘perhaps most important’, was that while (he hints) it had a benign influence on routine diplomacy, it contributed to ‘the accelerated speed of international crises’. This was serious because ‘[t]he faster pace of diplomatic disputes invited more emotional and less creative decisions on the part of statesmen, while public opinion, which sometimes moderates over the course of a long crisis, often exercised a belligerent influence on shorter crises’ (p. 191). This is inherently plausible and, in light of Nickles’ examples, historically persuasive, though no doubt diplomatic historians will argue furiously over it. I look forward to reading Thomas Otte’s review of this book, which is to be published in the European History Quarterly.
One final point: Nickles describes how the initial astonishment of politicians and journalists at the technical achievement of electric telegraphy led to much naive and ill-considered mid-century speculation that it promised the demise of the diplomatic service altogether. Of course, this did not happen, and prognoses of this sort diminished in the later decades of the nineteenth century (pp. 46-7). It is a pity that this was not recalled in the later years of the twentieth century, when a similar degree of intoxication was produced by jet aircraft and computer communication and produced exactly the same kind of rash predictions.
Related resources
The Diplomats, 1919-1939
11 Aug, 1994
Japanese middle-power diplomacy
10 Aug, 2012
Embassies and Foreign Courts
03 Aug, 1856
Diplomatic Education
10 Aug, 2007
The Queen’s Ambassador to the Sultan: Memoirs of Sir Henry A. Layard’s Constantinople Embassy, 1877-1880
10 Mar, 2010
The New Diplomacy
16 Aug, 2002
A practitioner’s view
04 Aug, 2001
Diplomacy and the American Democracy
12 Aug, 1988
The Palgrave Macmillan Dictionary of Diplomacy
17 Aug, 2018
Routledge Handbook of Public Diplomacy
14 Aug, 2008
Ever the Diplomat
24 Aug, 2013
Diplomacy: Theory and Practice, 3rd edn
04 Aug, 2005
Inside Diplomacy
10 Aug, 2000
Diplomats as cultural bridge builders
12 Aug, 2004
Brian Barder’s Diplomatic Diary
01 Aug, 2019
Diplomacy: Theory and Practice, Fifth Edition
13 Aug, 2015
Ottoman Diplomacy
06 Aug, 2004
Language and Diplomacy: Preface
24 Aug, 2001
English Medieval Diplomacy
09 Aug, 1985
The Turkish Embassy Letters
12 Aug, 1994
The Art of Diplomacy: The American Experience
15 Aug, 1968
The Consular Dimension of Diplomacy
08 Aug, 1986
The idea of diplomatic culture and its sources
13 Aug, 2004
The British Diplomatic Service 1815-1914
04 Aug, 1983
Diplomacy and Global Governance: The Diplomatic Service in an Age of Worldwide Interdependence
10 Aug, 2012
Inside Diplomacy
10 Jul, 2000
Positive Diplomacy
06 Aug, 1999
Persuasion, trust, and personal credibility
10 Aug, 2012
The inertia of Diplomacy
07 Aug, 2008
Beyond diplomatic – the unravelling of history
04 Aug, 2002
How do you know what you think you know?
02 Aug, 2002
Internet Guide for Diplomats
10 Aug, 2000
Performance Management in Foreign Ministries: Corporate Techniques in the Diplomatic Service
05 Aug, 2004
DiploDialogue – Metaphors for Diplomats
30 Aug, 2013
Diplomacy for the New Century
13 Aug, 1998
Diplomatic culture and its domestic context
13 Aug, 2004
Theatre of Power: The Art of Signaling
06 Aug, 1987
Embassies under Siege
25 Aug, 1995
The impact of the Internet on diplomatic reporting: how diplomacy training needs to be adjusted to keep pace
23 Aug, 2013
Just a Diplomat
17 Dec, 2008
The School for Ambassadors
11 Aug, 1922
Texts in diplomacy
16 Aug, 2001
A Dictionary of Diplomacy
11 Feb, 2000
I’ll be with you in a Minute Mr. Ambassador: The Education of a canadian Diplomat in Washington
09 Aug, 1991
On the manner of practising the new diplomacy
19 Apr, 2006
Bertie of Thame: Edwardian Ambassador
04 Aug, 1990
Lucky George: Memoirs of an Anti-Politician
29 Sep, 2005
Manuel de droit diplomatique
11 Aug, 1994
Why Persuasion? Reflections after 50 years of practising, teaching and studying diplomacy
09 Aug, 2013
Diplomacy for a Crowded World
13 Aug, 1976
A Selection of New diplomatic memoirs
04 Aug, 2000
The Professional Diplomat
21 Aug, 1969
The Work of Diplomacy
09 Aug, 2002
The Office of Ambassador in the Middle Ages
18 Aug, 1967
The Oxford Handbook of Modern Diplomacy
23 Aug, 2013
The New Diplomacy
02 Aug, 2002
Diplomat’s Dictionary
07 Aug, 2010
The Nineteenth Century Foreign Office
06 Aug, 1971
Diplomatenleben
23 Aug, 2013
Reflections on multistakeholder diplomacy
19 Apr, 2006
Diplomacy by other means
16 Aug, 2002
Politics Among Nations
11 Aug, 2005
Satow’s Diplomatic Practice, 6th ed
25 Aug, 2011
21st Century Diplomacy: A Practitioner’s Guide
08 Sep, 2011
Diplomatic Theory from Machiavelli to Kissinger
12 Aug, 2001
Embassies in Armed Conflict
16 Aug, 2012
Getting Our Way: 500 Years of Adventure and Intrigue: The Inside Story of British Diplomacy
13 Aug, 2011
Statecraft
15 Aug, 2008
Diplomacy: Theory and Practice, 4th ed
13 Aug, 2010
Pragmatics in diplomatic exchanges
10 Aug, 2001
Innovation in Diplomatic Practice
12 Aug, 1999
Public diplomacy: Taxonomies and histories
08 Aug, 2008
British Envoys to Germany 1816-1866
09 Nov, 2006
The Summer Capitals of Europe, 1814-1919
03 Aug, 2017
The Limits of Neorealism
06 Aug, 2004
The Rise of Modern Diplomacy, 1450-1919
13 Aug, 1993
FDR’s Ambassadors and the Diplomacy of Crisis: From the rise of Hitler to the end of World War II
24 Aug, 2013
Diplomacy: Theory and Practice
12 Aug, 2005
Renaissance Diplomacy and the Reformation
18 Aug, 1989
Quick Diplomatic Response
10 Aug, 2007
John le Carré: The Biography
28 Aug, 2015
21st Century Diplomacy: A practitioner’s guide
16 Jan, 2012
The Foreign Office
11 Aug, 1955
Essence of Diplomacy
29 Nov, 2005
The Evolution of Diplomatic Method
17 Aug, 1977
Language, signaling and diplomacy
10 Aug, 2001
Multistakeholder diplomacy at the OECD
19 Apr, 2006
Modern Diplomacy: Dialectics and Dimensions
08 Aug, 1980
Yes, (Saudi) Minister! A Life in Administration
06 Aug, 1999
The Ambassadors and America’s Soviet Policy
08 Aug, 1997
Diplomacy: The world of the honest spy
12 Aug, 1979
The Practice of Diplomacy, 2nd ed
20 Aug, 2010
A Dictionary of Diplomacy, Second Edition
14 Aug, 2003
Bilateral Diplomacy
19 Apr, 2007
International Regimes
13 Aug, 1983
Diplomacy at the Cutting Edge
12 Aug, 2016
True Brits: Inside the Foreign Office
19 Aug, 1994
Persuasion: bad practices and … others
15 Aug, 2013
The Diplomats, 1939-1979
12 Aug, 1994
Cursed is the Peacemaker: The American Diplomat [Philip Habib] Versus the Israeli General, Beirut 1982
09 Aug, 2002
Twitter for Diplomats
15 Aug, 2013
Lessons from two fields
05 Aug, 2004
The Visa Dimension of Diplomacy
06 Aug, 2004
Reforming Diplomacy: Clear Choices, New Emphases
26 Aug, 2011
Persuasion in sociology of diplomacy
02 Aug, 2013
A Diplomat in Japan
04 Aug, 1921
Diplomacy, Satire and the Victorians
01 Aug, 2018
Diplomacy: Theory and Practice, 2nd edn
08 Aug, 2002
Mediation in International Relations
05 Aug, 1994