First, his birth was illegitimate, so the records of his early life are either largely fictitious or non-existent. Second, because he was a whistleblower but relatively impecunious, he went to great lengths to cover his own literary tracks in order to safeguard his salaried income, so it is by no means easy to identify his writing, especially his newspaper articles. Third, because aristocrats both inside and outside the Foreign Office were desperate to contrive his downfall a whole raft of damaging myths was created about his official conduct and particular events in his life, and these have been constantly re-cycled – and inevitably embellished. … Finally, he left no personal collection of private papers – no private correspondence, no diaries, no unpublished memoirs…
Berridge closes his book with these words:Grenville-Murray’s ultimate misfortune was that his two great patrons, Dickens and Palmerston, tugged him in opposite directions: the former to the literary exposure of social evils, the latter to the important work of diplomacy. He was no saint but it remains to his credit that, despite the tension between them and the strain that simultaneously plying these two trades imposed on his family, he made such a valuable contribution to both over such a long period. He deserves a better place in history than that pegged on the lazy re-cycling of the myths that he was a ‘scurrilous’ journalist deservedly ‘horsewhipped’ by a nobleman he had offended.
Two observations about this lively chronicle of an extraordinary life in diplomacy and journalism: first, its contemporary relevance (you can’t help noticing the partial parallels with another equally talented Murray whose controversial diplomatic career was eventually terminated by a hostile and exasperated Foreign Office); and, secondly, what an excellent film could be made of Berridge’s book, one that would be exciting and funny in equal parts. Conversion of the text to a film script wouldn’t be exceptionally difficult. It might need a voice-over narrator for which Geoff Berridge’s own distinctive voice would be ideal. In the introduction to his book on his own website, Berridge sets out no fewer than 16 reasons for his decision to publish it as an ordinary PDF file on his website rather than submitting it to his publishers for publication as a book, whether in hard covers, as a paperback or as an e-book, or any combination of the three. All book publishers should take the precaution of thinking carefully about the professor’s 16 reasons, which have significant lessons for them. The downside seems to be the greater difficulty in spreading awareness of the existence of the book on a single semi-private website: very little chance of reviews in specialist or general interest journals or newspapers, no mentions in publishers’ lists or advertisements. It’s there, absolutely free and ready to be downloaded, but how many people know about it? It’s even quite easy to send it from one’s own computer to a Kindle, if you have a Kindle account, so that you can add it to your Kindle library to read on the train, or plane, or in your favourite Chinese restaurant when lunching or dining alone. So please heed this earnest plea: if you’re prompted by this to download and read A Diplomatic Whistleblower in the Victorian Era, and if you enjoy it as much as I did, spread the word about it, and send your friends and family without delay to https://grberridge.diplomacy.edu/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/GrenvilleMurray.01.pdf. PS: Full disclosure: Geoff Berridge is an old friend. A few years ago I made some modest contributions as Editorial Consultant to the first edition of his extraordinarily useful and readable Dictionary of Diplomacy: please see the Preface to the First Edition in subsequent editions. More recently he has proved an excellent mentor and literary godfather helping in very many ways to bring my own first (and last) book, What Diplomats Do, into a not particularly startled world — please see https://www.barder.com/4229. Note: Review was first published on Brian Barder’s website and is reposted here with permission from the author. Review by Brian BarderRelated resources
British Diplomacy in Turkey, 1583 to the Present: A Study in the Evolution of the Resident Embassy
04 Aug, 2009
Public diplomacy: Sunrise of an academic field
15 Aug, 2008
The Evolution of Diplomatic Method
17 Aug, 1977
Years of Upheaval
20 Aug, 1982
The Summer Capitals of Europe, 1814-1919
03 Aug, 2017
The Ambassadors and America’s Soviet Policy
08 Aug, 1997
The Forgotten French
01 Aug, 2003
Post Cold War diplomatic training
19 Apr, 2006
Ottoman Diplomacy
06 Aug, 2004
Tilkidom and the Ottoman Empire: The Letters of Gerald Fitzmaurice to George Lloyd, 1906-15
08 Aug, 2008
Misunderstood: The IT manager’s lament
06 Aug, 2004
History and the evolution of diplomacy
06 Aug, 1998
Genghis Khan and the Making of the Modern World
13 Aug, 2004
A Manual of Greek Antiquities
04 Aug, 1895
The Diplomats, 1919-1939
11 Aug, 1994
The Nineteenth Century Foreign Office
06 Aug, 1971
The evolution of diplomacy in the Caribbean
02 Aug, 2013
Japanese middle-power diplomacy
10 Aug, 2012
The Professional Diplomat
21 Aug, 1969
FDR’s Ambassadors and the Diplomacy of Crisis: From the rise of Hitler to the end of World War II
24 Aug, 2013
The ‘Working’ Non-Aligned Movement: Between Belgrade, Cairo, and Baku – The NAM’s Leadership Visibility
07 Aug, 2020
Lord Elgin and the Marbles
14 Aug, 1998
The Queen’s Ambassador to the Sultan: Memoirs of Sir Henry A. Layard’s Constantinople Embassy, 1877-1880
10 Mar, 2010
Peacemaking 1919
09 Aug, 1933
The languages of the Knights
17 Aug, 2001
Munitions of the Mind: A history of propaganda from the ancient world to the present era
03 Aug, 2003
Just a Diplomat
17 Dec, 2008
Diplomacy and Secret Service
10 Aug, 2019
Machiavelli’s Legations
10 Aug, 2001
The History of Diplomatic Immunity
11 Dec, 1999
The Breaking of Nations
19 Apr, 2006
The Rise of Modern Diplomacy, 1450-1919
13 Aug, 1993
Philosophy of Rhetoric
07 Aug, 1868
The Imperial Component in Iran’s Foreign Policy: Towards Arab Mashreq and Arab Gulf States
19 Aug, 2011
Renaissance Diplomacy and the Reformation
18 Aug, 1989
Beyond diplomatic – the unravelling of history
04 Aug, 2002
The British Diplomatic Service 1815-1914
04 Aug, 1983
A Diplomat in Japan
04 Aug, 1921
English Medieval Diplomacy
09 Aug, 1985
The post-modern state and the world order
11 Aug, 2000
The Office of Ambassador in the Middle Ages
18 Aug, 1967
A kind of diplomatic incantation: Exchanging British and Japanese diplomats in the Second World War
02 Feb, 2012
The Expansion of International Society
16 Aug, 1985
The Turkish Embassy Letters
12 Aug, 1994
The British Interests Section in Kampala, 1976-7
16 Aug, 2012
Bertie of Thame: Edwardian Ambassador
04 Aug, 1990
Nation, Class, and Diplomacy: The dragomanate of the British embassy in Constantinople, 1814-1914
15 Aug, 2008
The Congress of Arras, 1435
25 Aug, 1972
The Diplomats, 1939-1979
12 Aug, 1994
British Envoys to Germany 1816-1866
09 Nov, 2006
The History of Diplomatic Immunity
20 Aug, 1999
Diplomacy in Ancient Greece
08 Aug, 1975
Regionalism in the Post-Cold War World
11 Aug, 2000
Politics and Diplomacy in Early Modern Italy: The structure of diplomatic practice, 1450-1800
26 Apr, 2007
US Public Diplomacy: A Cold War Success Story?
10 Aug, 2007
Getting Our Way: 500 Years of Adventure and Intrigue: The Inside Story of British Diplomacy
13 Aug, 2011
The Journey of Man: A Genetic Odyssey
01 Aug, 2003