A heightened awareness of how others speak, and the skill to identify what went well and what could have gone better, help improve our own speaking styles. Using presentations as a medium of delivery – impromptu, extemporaneous, manuscript, and memor...
  21 Apr 2017

Event
Table of contents Categorising cultures Lewis categorisation High context and low context Ambiguity Other categorisations Improving intercultural communication Cultural diplomacy Translation and interpretation T...

Topic page
Table of contents Why is language important to diplomacy? Speech act theory Persuasion and rhetoric Analysing rhetorics Repetition Association Composition Omission Diversion Confusion War propaga...

Topic page
Language is riddled with gaps. Some are yawning gulfs, such as the abyss between what you meant to say and what you actually said when it came out all wrong, or between what you thought you’d said and what the other party understood. Others are so sm...
 4 Mar 2013

Blog post

In this paper, Drazen Pehar analyses the argumentation made by George Lakoff of the University of California at Berkeley in his seminal paper  on ‘Metaphor and War’, in which he tried to deconstruct the rhetoric U.S. president George Bush used to justify the war in the Gulf. He also analyses a reading by psycho-historian Lloyd deMause, whose theory differs from Lakoff’s. Throughout his analysis, Pehar describes the role of rhetoric in diplomatic prevention of armed conflicts, and its several functions, and concludes that the methods of preventive diplomacy depend heavily on the theory of leaders’ rhetoric one considers credible.

Source: 
Knowledge and Diplomacy. Ed by J. Kurbalija (2002)
 Drazen Pehar, 2002

Resource text

Printer Friendly and PDF
Subscribe to Argumentation