Chinese Ambassadors: The rise of diplomatic professionalism since 1945
Xiaohong’s method is to present the biographies of a small number of ambassadors she takes to be representative of the four generations of Chinese ambassadors between 1949 and 1994 that she identifies. In between the biographical chapters she steps back and describes the sources of recruitment and typical attitudes of each generation. Those with military backgrounds and other veterans of the Long March only slowly ceased to dominate the ranks of China’s diplomats and for this and other well known reasons it is hardly surprising that, for some years after the revolution, there were many ‘baffled ambassadors’ perched on ‘cold benches’ abroad. The devastating impact of the cultural revolution, which began in 1966 and is the watershed between the second and third generations, is fully detailed. The rest of the book is an account of how the diplomatic service – overseen until his death in 1986 by Zhou Enlai – slowly clawed its way back, turning increasingly to university graduates for recruits and adopting a more ‘professional’ style. The fourth generation (1984-1990s) even began to develop a ‘collegial rapport’ with ‘fellow diplomats from other countries’.
It is not surprising to learn from Xiaohong’s book that in the last twenty years or so the PRC’s diplomatic missions have been doing essentially the same kind of work as those of other states. Public diplomacy began to take on more significance, especially in trying to repair Beijing’s image after the Tiananmen Square killings in 1989, when China’s ambassadors once more found themselves shivering on ‘cold benches’. (That this was too much for some to swallow is evidenced by the fact that this event was followed by an unprecedented number of defections from China’s missions abroad.) Commercial work also became extremely important, not least for embassies in the Arab world, where the PRC had developed major economic interests. (The desperate lengths to which Guan Zihuai, the ambassador to Kuwait, went to return to Kuwait City in 1991 after the expulsion of Saddam’s forces is fully described and extremely instructive in this regard.) The Chinese diplomatic service even began to appoint a few women ambassadors, and in the mid-1990s abandoned its long-established prohibition on locally engaged staff.
In view of the obvious patchiness of the source material available to her at the Chinese end, I think that – speaking as a non-Sinologist – Xiaohong has done remarkably well with this book. It is a pity, though, that where source material abroad was readily available she sometimes passed up the opportunity to consult it. Some parts of her work must as a result be treated with great caution, not least her account of Sino-British relations in late August 1967, which cites just one (Chinese) source. This is not only peppered with errors but provides a seriously flawed analysis. The burning of the British Office (not ’embassy’) of which Donald Hopson (not ‘Hobson’) was chargé d’affaires, and the sacking of the residence, did not provoke ‘the British public’ to take ‘revenge by staging a siege of the Chinese embassy [actually ‘Office’] in London’. (Because the British insisted on retaining consular missions in Taiwan, Beijing refused an exchange of missions headed by ‘ambassadors’, i.e. ’embassies’, though London continued to call its own mission in Beijing the ‘British Embassy’ until it was forced to leave the old building at the end of the 1950s.) It is certainly true that the FO fell in with Hopson’s plea that it should keep hold of the Chinese diplomats as hostages to be used in his negotiations for an amelioration in the appalling conditions of his own staff. Consequently, the staff of the Chinese mission in Portland Place were informed that they would not be allowed to leave the country without an exit visa, could not go further than five miles from Marble Arch without permission, and could not use diplomatic wireless. Shortly after this, the police guard on the mission was doubled in order to enforce these orders and as a precaution against protesters, though the only other persons initially present in any numbers were pressmen. Some ‘siege’. I concede, however, that, in the hysterical atmosphere provoked by the cultural revolution at its height, it could easily have felt like a ‘siege’ inside the Chinese mission.
Thereafter, a few hotheads and eccentrics began to gather and jeer at the Chinese diplomats, who periodically replied in kind by brandishing at them Mao’s ‘little red book’. However, on 29 August, to the evident astonishment of the police, who had only their batons and dustbin lids with which to defend themselves (Ah! Resourceful nation!) about 20 Chinese ‘diplomats’ sallied out of the mission (Aux armes, citoyens!) and attacked their lines with baseball bats, cudgels, bottles, and at least one axe. What was subsequently dubbed the ‘Battle of Portland Place’ lasted for about five minutes. It left not much worse than some nasty cuts and bruises on both sides, and was immediately followed by an order banning any further protesters (whether packers from Muswell Hill, drivers from Poplar, or sociologists from Hampstead – presumably siding with the ‘besieged’), from assembling in the vicinity of Portland Place. However, Xiaohong then makes another mistake by saying that the Chinese diplomats in London and the British diplomats in Beijing became hostages of each other’s government ‘[a]fter the incident’. In fact, of course, it was precisely because the British were already being held hostage in Beijing that London had placed tighter restrictions on the mobility of the Chinese diplomats – and all of this happened before the Battle of Portland Place.
All of these points would have been clear to Xiaohong if she had simply read The Times, which was then still a decent newspaper. The British position was also spelled out in the memoirs (published in 1971) of the British prime minister at the time, Harold Wilson. An even more illuminating British source on this incident is Percy Cradock’s Experiences of China (1994). Cradock was at the time truly besieged – in Beijing. Nevertheless, Chinese Ambassadors remains a valuable and very interesting piece of research. As Xiaohong says in her introduction, a serious deficiency in diplomatic studies is the absence of work on diplomats from non-Western cultures, and she has made an important step towards its correction.
Related resources
Routledge Handbook of Public Diplomacy
14 Aug, 2008
The Visa Dimension of Diplomacy
06 Aug, 2004
Diplomatic culture and its domestic context
13 Aug, 2004
A Dictionary of Diplomacy
11 Feb, 2000
Mediation in International Relations
05 Aug, 1994
English Medieval Diplomacy
09 Aug, 1985
Getting Our Way: 500 Years of Adventure and Intrigue: The Inside Story of British Diplomacy
13 Aug, 2011
Essence of Diplomacy
29 Nov, 2005
Public diplomacy: Taxonomies and histories
08 Aug, 2008
The Practice of Diplomacy, 2nd ed
20 Aug, 2010
The Diplomats, 1939-1979
12 Aug, 1994
The impact of the Internet on diplomatic reporting: how diplomacy training needs to be adjusted to keep pace
23 Aug, 2013
Inside Diplomacy
10 Aug, 2000
Diplomacy by other means
16 Aug, 2002
Bertie of Thame: Edwardian Ambassador
04 Aug, 1990
Lucky George: Memoirs of an Anti-Politician
29 Sep, 2005
The Diplomats, 1919-1939
11 Aug, 1994
The Limits of Neorealism
06 Aug, 2004
Innovation in Diplomatic Practice
12 Aug, 1999
British Envoys to Germany 1816-1866
09 Nov, 2006
Persuasion: bad practices and … others
15 Aug, 2013
Reforming Diplomacy: Clear Choices, New Emphases
26 Aug, 2011
FDR’s Ambassadors and the Diplomacy of Crisis: From the rise of Hitler to the end of World War II
24 Aug, 2013
Positive Diplomacy
06 Aug, 1999
A Selection of New diplomatic memoirs
04 Aug, 2000
Modern Diplomacy: Dialectics and Dimensions
08 Aug, 1980
DiploDialogue – Metaphors for Diplomats
30 Aug, 2013
The Evolution of Diplomatic Method
17 Aug, 1977
The Rise of Modern Diplomacy, 1450-1919
13 Aug, 1993
The Summer Capitals of Europe, 1814-1919
03 Aug, 2017
Diplomacy: Theory and Practice, 2nd edn
08 Aug, 2002
The Turkish Embassy Letters
12 Aug, 1994
The Foreign Office
11 Aug, 1955
Why Persuasion? Reflections after 50 years of practising, teaching and studying diplomacy
09 Aug, 2013
The Office of Ambassador in the Middle Ages
18 Aug, 1967
The Consular Dimension of Diplomacy
08 Aug, 1986
Language, signaling and diplomacy
10 Aug, 2001
The Nineteenth Century Foreign Office
06 Aug, 1971
The inertia of Diplomacy
07 Aug, 2008
Diplomatic Theory from Machiavelli to Kissinger
12 Aug, 2001
Statecraft
15 Aug, 2008
A Dictionary of Diplomacy, Second Edition
14 Aug, 2003
The School for Ambassadors
11 Aug, 1922
The British Diplomatic Service 1815-1914
04 Aug, 1983
Diplomacy at the Cutting Edge
12 Aug, 2016
Diplomatenleben
23 Aug, 2013
A practitioner’s view
04 Aug, 2001
Diplomacy, Satire and the Victorians
01 Aug, 2018
Persuasion, trust, and personal credibility
10 Aug, 2012
Reflections on multistakeholder diplomacy
19 Apr, 2006
Diplomat’s Dictionary
07 Aug, 2010
The Palgrave Macmillan Dictionary of Diplomacy
17 Aug, 2018
Embassies in Armed Conflict
16 Aug, 2012
Diplomacy and the American Democracy
12 Aug, 1988
Beyond diplomatic – the unravelling of history
04 Aug, 2002
International Regimes
13 Aug, 1983
The New Diplomacy
16 Aug, 2002
The Oxford Handbook of Modern Diplomacy
23 Aug, 2013
The idea of diplomatic culture and its sources
13 Aug, 2004
True Brits: Inside the Foreign Office
19 Aug, 1994
I’ll be with you in a Minute Mr. Ambassador: The Education of a canadian Diplomat in Washington
09 Aug, 1991
Internet Guide for Diplomats
10 Aug, 2000
Just a Diplomat
17 Dec, 2008
The Professional Diplomat
21 Aug, 1969
Texts in diplomacy
16 Aug, 2001
Diplomats as cultural bridge builders
12 Aug, 2004
The New Diplomacy
02 Aug, 2002
Multistakeholder diplomacy at the OECD
19 Apr, 2006
21st Century Diplomacy: A Practitioner’s Guide
08 Sep, 2011
Twitter for Diplomats
15 Aug, 2013
A Diplomat in Japan
04 Aug, 1921
Ever the Diplomat
24 Aug, 2013
Diplomacy: Theory and Practice, 4th ed
13 Aug, 2010
How do you know what you think you know?
02 Aug, 2002
Theatre of Power: The Art of Signaling
06 Aug, 1987
The Queen’s Ambassador to the Sultan: Memoirs of Sir Henry A. Layard’s Constantinople Embassy, 1877-1880
10 Mar, 2010
Cursed is the Peacemaker: The American Diplomat [Philip Habib] Versus the Israeli General, Beirut 1982
09 Aug, 2002
Diplomacy for the New Century
13 Aug, 1998
Bilateral Diplomacy
19 Apr, 2007
Japanese middle-power diplomacy
10 Aug, 2012
Ottoman Diplomacy
06 Aug, 2004
Pragmatics in diplomatic exchanges
10 Aug, 2001
Performance Management in Foreign Ministries: Corporate Techniques in the Diplomatic Service
05 Aug, 2004
Diplomacy: Theory and Practice
12 Aug, 2005
Diplomacy for a Crowded World
13 Aug, 1976
Language and Diplomacy: Preface
24 Aug, 2001
The Ambassadors and America’s Soviet Policy
08 Aug, 1997
Quick Diplomatic Response
10 Aug, 2007
Satow’s Diplomatic Practice, 6th ed
25 Aug, 2011
The Work of Diplomacy
09 Aug, 2002
Diplomacy: Theory and Practice, Fifth Edition
13 Aug, 2015
The Art of Diplomacy: The American Experience
15 Aug, 1968
Politics Among Nations
11 Aug, 2005
Lessons from two fields
05 Aug, 2004
Yes, (Saudi) Minister! A Life in Administration
06 Aug, 1999
Diplomacy: The world of the honest spy
12 Aug, 1979
John le Carré: The Biography
28 Aug, 2015
Manuel de droit diplomatique
11 Aug, 1994
Renaissance Diplomacy and the Reformation
18 Aug, 1989
On the manner of practising the new diplomacy
19 Apr, 2006
Embassies and Foreign Courts
03 Aug, 1856
Embassies under Siege
25 Aug, 1995
21st Century Diplomacy: A practitioner’s guide
16 Jan, 2012
Diplomacy: Theory and Practice, 3rd edn
04 Aug, 2005
Persuasion in sociology of diplomacy
02 Aug, 2013
Inside Diplomacy
10 Jul, 2000
Brian Barder’s Diplomatic Diary
01 Aug, 2019
Diplomatic Education
10 Aug, 2007