New: Consult the report from a seminar "Persuasion, the essence of diplomacy'.

Persuasion, the essence of diplomacy was the theme of a seminar being organised in honour of Prof. Dietrich Kappeler's 80th birthday, founder of Mediterranean Academy of Diplomatic Studies and DiploFoundation.

The event gathered practitioners and academics to discuss the issue of persuasion in diplomacy and modern politics (consult the programme). What type of persuasion is effective? Is persuasion different on the Internet?

 
 
 
 
 

Persuasion is one of the threads that connect ancient diplomats with twenty-first-century diplomacy in the digital age. Today, as ever, to persuade and/or be persuaded is one of the diplomat’s key concerns. Social media tools such as Twitter and Facebook may have changed the playing field a little, but the essence of diplomacy remains the same. 

Persuasion – language-mediated influence, a peaceful and sincere change of diplomatic view, and the congruence of attitudes – has been and will continue to be a valued skill, a characteristic that we share with the earliest diplomats, our predecessors.

Persuasion, the Essence of Diplomacy is the theme Prof. Dietrich Kappeler selected for his farewell symposium. We are in the process of compiling and publishing the proceedings from this symposium in a book of the same title to honour Prof. Kappeler life’s work in the area of diplomatic scholarship and education. The book will be presented at the Geneva Seminar in April 2013.

We invite you to join our online discussion and the Geneva Seminar. If you need more information please contact us at persuasion@diplomacy.edu

Questions for discussion

  • Do you agree with Professor Kappeler’s view that persuasion is the essence of diplomacy? Does this reflect your experience?
  • Persuasion implies a change in the mental state of the persuaded side. Have you personally tried to change and succeeded in changing the ideas of your counterparts or diplomatic interlocutors in general?
  • When you managed to persuade them, what in your own view was the decisive factor: argument, emotion, rhetorical skill, the structure of incentives such as awards and penalties....
  • Have you had a negative experience with the process? For instance, have you dealt with some diplomatic actors who were extremely resistant to your attempts at persuasion? What lessons could we draw from such experience? 
  • Have you ever been persuaded by a diplomatic counterpart or interlocutor? What is it that explains their persuasiveness? Have some diplomatic counterparts tried but failed to persuade you? What, in your own view, explains this failure?
  • Who were the best persuaders you have met in your career? What were their key strengths (argument, emotion, charisma....) ? Do historical considerations play an important role in the process?
  • Do you think that persuasion will change in the Internet era? Will it be easier or more difficult to persuade via the Internet?

Comments

francisco gomes... (not verified)

Have read the well-formulated questions. One dimension of Persuasion Analysis applied to Diplomatic Communication has to do with the statistical frequency of persuasion-focused phraseologies across languages and cultures.Thus in English-cultures,if you collect samples of such phraseology, expressions such as these will come up: 
that`s an interesting point you`re making,but evidence (source)shows that...
Granted, I would admit that....... but  would also argue for....
Research is globally needed on the most frequently used phraseologies centered on Persuasion. Maybe DIPLO can sponsor  such initiative ?
 

Editor
Editor's picture

Dear Francisco, thank you for your comment. Given your interest and knowledge on the subject, one of our current courses - Language and Diplomacy - might be of particular interest to you. Should you wish to read more about the course, including the topics covered, the direct link is http://www.diplomacy.edu/courses/language. Best, Stephanie

Add new comment

Filtered HTML

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • You may use [view:name=display=args] tags to display views.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • You may use [view:name=display=args] tags to display views.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters shown in the image.