Question: When is a diplomatic victory not a diplomatic victory? Answer: When it is achieved by means of a veto in the Security Council of the United Nations. Nowhere is this maxim more tellingly illustrated than in the Council’s meeting in New York in November 1996 which voted on the issue of whether or not to give a full second term (five years) to the Secretary-General, the University of Paris educated Egyptian scholar-diplomat, Dr Boutros Boutros-Ghali. Of the 15 members of the Council, 14 voted in favour and one voted against. Since that member was the United States this represented a veto – and that, to all intents and purposes, was the end of Africa’s first UN Secretary-General.
The US government had come to the conclusion that it did not want an independent spirit on the 38th Floor of the Secretariat and thought that ‘BB-G’ would make a useful scapegoat for the failures of US policy in the Balkans and Somalia. However, it had tried to avoid having to use its veto by going to extraordinary lengths to persuade his supporters to drop him. The State Department barnstormed an OAU summit, sent the Secretary of State himself on a trip to Africa, spread disinformation, and arm-twisted the other members of the Security Council. His official phone lines were tapped – or so he believes. The State Department even tried tempting him to stand down voluntarily with the offer of his own US-financed foundation and a new title – ‘Secretary-General of the United Nations Emeritus’. (Since this would signify ‘honourable discharge’ it was presumably intended to distinguish him from Kurt Waldheim, the predecessor with the somewhat questionable war record.) And yet, when it came to the vote on his future in the Security Council, not even the British supported the Americans – which tells us just what a diplomatic debacle for them this was.
But so what? As Boutros-Ghali says, ‘Only the weak rely on diplomacy [which] is perceived by an imperial power as a waste of time and prestige and a sign of weakness’ (p. 198). Of course, he exaggerates – as the half of his own book that I have summarised above amply demonstrates – but there is a kernel of truth in this observation. And this book, by any standards, is a quite riveting account of how and why the United States tried diplomacy but in the end shrugged its shoulders and cast its veto against Boutros Boutros-Ghali – even though its vital interests were not at stake. It is also likely to make angry anyone who thinks – as I do – that the world diplomatic system can only suffer from the political emasculation of the UN Secretariat. I have added some references to this valuable memoir, with its account of the ‘UN-vanquished’ but its Secretary-General morally ‘Unvanquished’ (the title is a clever pun), on the Updating Pages for my textbook.
Review by Geoff Berridge
Related resources
Diplomacy and Developing Nations: Post-Cold War foreign policy-making structures and processes
15 Aug, 2009
Will WikiLeaks Hobble U.S. Diplomacy?
20 Aug, 2010
Diplomatic Interference and the Law
12 Aug, 2016
The British Interests Section in Kampala, 1976-7
16 Aug, 2012
Nixon’s Trip to China
08 Aug, 2003
The Embassy: A story of war and diplomacy
19 Aug, 2016
World on Fire: How Exporting Free-Market Democracy Breeds Ethnic Hatred and Global Instability
08 Aug, 2003
Secret, lies and diplomats
10 Aug, 2007
Transformational Diplomacy after the Cold War: Britain’s Know How Fund in Post-Communist Europe, 1989-2003
30 Apr, 2013
Current developments in South African diplomacy
14 Aug, 1998
Small States and the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) of the EU: A Comparative Analysis
11 Aug, 2000
The United Nations and Israel
31 Aug, 2012
Economic Statecraft
15 Aug, 1985
Diplomacy and the American Democracy
12 Aug, 1988
Japanese middle-power diplomacy
10 Aug, 2012
Understanding Iran’s Media Diplomacy
24 Aug, 2012
Diplomacy for a Crowded World
13 Aug, 1976
The Yugoslav diplomatic service under sanctions
13 Aug, 1998
A Digital DFAT: Joining the 21st Century
06 Aug, 2010
Health, security and foreign policy
19 Apr, 2006
Making Foreign Policy: A Certain Idea of Britain
15 Mar, 2000
Years of Upheaval
20 Aug, 1982
The Imperial Component in Iran’s Foreign Policy: Towards Arab Mashreq and Arab Gulf States
19 Aug, 2011
European Union external action structure: Beyond state and intergovernmental organisations diplomacy
11 Aug, 2018
Experiences of China
05 Aug, 1994
US Public Diplomacy: A Cold War Success Story?
10 Aug, 2007
2021: The emergence of digital foreign policy
02 Mar, 2021
South Africa, the Colonial Powers and ‘African Defence’: The rise and fall of the white entente, 1948-60
20 Aug, 1992
Impact of Russia’s Foreign Energy Policy on Small European States’ Security. Case Study: The Baltic States
15 Aug, 2009
Britain and Southern Africa
04 Aug, 1983
Tested in Times of Transition
24 Aug, 2012
Oslo Ministerial Declaration – global health: a pressing foreign policy issue of our time
09 Aug, 2007
True Brits: Inside the Foreign Office
19 Aug, 1994
Global Health and the Foreign Policy Agenda
07 Aug, 2008
Modernising Dutch Diplomacy
09 Aug, 2013