According to Sir John, both foreign and domestic policy-making now suffer from unprecedented time pressures. This is because higher priority is now attached to the second order activities of management and policy presentation, and because the work-load has been increased further by the complexity of modern government, the speed of communications, and the huge growth in information. However, when to this is added the fact that foreign policy-making is uniquely hampered by the unpredictability of its environment and, in Britain’s case, further impaired by a traditional wooliness about the country’s proper role abroad, it should not be surprising, he says, that there is now concern about its quality. Though Sir John does not think that foreign policy-making in Britain has been all that bad, he concedes that its critics have a case, and the most stimulating sections of his book are to be found where – strongly influenced by recent Australian practice – he suggests what is to be done.
Clear objectives should be set in an annual White Paper so that the state’s foreign policy can be easily understood and its success measured. This ‘mission statement’ should reflect an idea of Britain not as a middle power but as ‘a major European power with global interests and responsibilities’. Foreign Secretaries should be kept in post for longer periods. Overload should be dealt with by bureaucratic devices such as ‘away-days’, freeing Permanent Secretaries of management responsibilities altogether, relaxing the pressure on ministers and senior officials to master the details of all policies by publicising the fact that they cannot and should not be expected to do this, and cutting back on summitry. More time and resources should be found for long-term planning. More money should be spent on Britain’s representation overseas, and the decline in the importance of the geographical departments in the FO should be arrested. The importance of the diplomat’s ‘political work’, which he says is ‘the essential foundation of foreign policy-making’, should also be acknowledged. Finally, says Sir John, more ways should be found of listening to outside advice.
Anyone who has suffered in a British university from the dead-head culture of managerialism will wince at some of the expressions used in this book. They will not need to be told, either, that recourse to a ‘mission statement’ is a sure sign that the institution in question has lost its way. Nevertheless, I would like to think that Sir John Coles uses this language with tongue in cheek, and to the substance of what he says I reply on all counts: ‘Amen’. This is an elegant, shrewd, and measured book which should be widely read.
Students of diplomacy will find particularly useful his chronological survey of the various official reviews of British foreign policy and diplomacy conducted since the Second World War (ch. 3); his defence of current practice, including the existing level of overseas representation and political work (ch. 4, and esp. pp. 141-52); his doubts about ‘preventive diplomacy’ (pp. 115-16); his observations on the shifting balance between geographical and functional departments in the FO (pp. 118-20, 147); and his forlorn attack on summitry (pp. 136-7).
Related resources
European Union external action structure: Beyond state and intergovernmental organisations diplomacy
11 Aug, 2018
Britain and Southern Africa
04 Aug, 1983
US Public Diplomacy: A Cold War Success Story?
10 Aug, 2007
Nixon’s Trip to China
08 Aug, 2003
Impact of Russia’s Foreign Energy Policy on Small European States’ Security. Case Study: The Baltic States
15 Aug, 2009
The United Nations and Israel
31 Aug, 2012
Modernising Dutch Diplomacy
09 Aug, 2013
Will WikiLeaks Hobble U.S. Diplomacy?
20 Aug, 2010
Health, security and foreign policy
19 Apr, 2006
True Brits: Inside the Foreign Office
19 Aug, 1994
Current developments in South African diplomacy
14 Aug, 1998
The Imperial Component in Iran’s Foreign Policy: Towards Arab Mashreq and Arab Gulf States
19 Aug, 2011
Unvanquished: A U.S.-U.N. Saga
06 Aug, 1999
Years of Upheaval
20 Aug, 1982
Economic Statecraft
15 Aug, 1985
The Embassy: A story of war and diplomacy
19 Aug, 2016
South Africa, the Colonial Powers and ‘African Defence’: The rise and fall of the white entente, 1948-60
20 Aug, 1992
Tested in Times of Transition
24 Aug, 2012
Diplomacy and Developing Nations: Post-Cold War foreign policy-making structures and processes
15 Aug, 2009
Diplomacy for a Crowded World
13 Aug, 1976
Small States and the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) of the EU: A Comparative Analysis
11 Aug, 2000
Transformational Diplomacy after the Cold War: Britain’s Know How Fund in Post-Communist Europe, 1989-2003
30 Apr, 2013
Japanese middle-power diplomacy
10 Aug, 2012
Experiences of China
05 Aug, 1994
Diplomatic Interference and the Law
12 Aug, 2016
The Yugoslav diplomatic service under sanctions
13 Aug, 1998
2021: The emergence of digital foreign policy
02 Mar, 2021
World on Fire: How Exporting Free-Market Democracy Breeds Ethnic Hatred and Global Instability
08 Aug, 2003
A Digital DFAT: Joining the 21st Century
06 Aug, 2010
Secret, lies and diplomats
10 Aug, 2007
Global Health and the Foreign Policy Agenda
07 Aug, 2008
The British Interests Section in Kampala, 1976-7
16 Aug, 2012
Oslo Ministerial Declaration – global health: a pressing foreign policy issue of our time
09 Aug, 2007
Understanding Iran’s Media Diplomacy
24 Aug, 2012
Diplomacy and the American Democracy
12 Aug, 1988