The US is pursuing holistic digital diplomacy
Updated on 07 September 2022
Following the 9/11 terrorist attacks, US intelligence agencies were fundamentally reformed in order to address fragmentation and policy silos as major reasons for their failure to prevent these attacks. It is now the turn of US diplomacy for a holistic approach in cybersecurity, digital economics, and online rights.
On 4 April, the US State Department established the Bureau of Cyberspace and Digital Policy (CDP) to address one of the most significant challenges in digital diplomacy, namely that the ‘left hand doesn’t know what the right hand is doing’.
Cross-cutting digital issues can’t be addressed effectively by rigid diplomatic hierarchies and policy silos. For example, negotiating data governance rules requires a comprehensive coverage of standardisation, e-commerce, privacy protection, and cybersecurity issues, to name a few.
This new bureau is part of a wider effort to ‘modernize both the purpose and institution’ of American diplomacy. Many countries around the world face the same challenge of reforming their diplomatic services to address digital challenges.
How will the new bureau operate?
The State Department underscored the holistic approach with the announcement that the bureau would
lead and coordinate the Department’s work on cyberspace and digital diplomacy to encourage responsible state behaviour in cyberspace and advance policies that protect the integrity and security of the infrastructure of the Internet, serve U.S. interests, promote competitiveness, and uphold democratic values.
Cybersecurity is a priority along with infrastructure, business, and human rights. The bureau will be composed of three units: International Cyberspace Security, International Information and Communications Policy, and Digital Freedom. A Senate-confirmed ambassador-at-large will ensure that the bureau has the necessary political weight.
What are the key challenges facing the new bureau?
Digital diplomacy goes beyond the State Department and involves more actors. Some of them (for example, the Department of Commerce for e-commerce, and the Federal Communications Commission (Internet infrastructure) have a long history of dealing with international issues.
US tech firms also have ‘diplomatic services,’ which Microsoft has officially launched. They are active participants in international digital policies. Moreover, they have interests that are not always in line with those of official Washington, DC
While the bureau is likely to achieve a ‘State Department as the whole; approach, it will prove much more difficult to ensure ‘government as the whole’ or ‘country as the whole’ approaches in digital foreign policy.
In many ways, the bureau’s work is an experiment in vivo to develop a new type of diplomacy. The successes and failures of its work will be closely monitored by diplomatic services around the world experiencing similar challenges.
Stay up-to-date with digital diplomacy developments by visiting Diplo’s Digital Diplomacy Hub.
Leave a ReplyWant to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!