The text discusses the intersection of diplomacy and Web 2.0, highlighting the influence of social networks and emergent behavior. It emphasizes the shift towards bottom-up, decentralized communication, challenging traditional diplomatic practices. The text raises questions about the effectiveness and risks of leveraging Web 2.0 for diplomatic purposes, noting the potential loss of autonomy and the need to adapt to the dynamics of online conversations. Additionally, it explores the complexities of using social networks for nation branding and the impact of Web 2.0 on public perception and political movements.

Analogies are powerful tools but can be misleading. The origin of Easter Island's moai statues is often misunderstood, blaming Polynesians for deforestation. In reality, the Polynesian rat played a crucial role by eating native plant seeds and hindering tree regeneration. Additionally, misconceptions about how the moai were moved were corrected when evidence showed they likely "walked" into place. Analogies can limit our understanding, emphasizing the importance of testing them against empirical evidence. In this case, rather than blaming humans, the Polynesian rat should take the responsibility for environmental degradation on Easter Island.

Swiss diplomat Olivier Long played a pivotal role as an intermediary during the Algeria negotiations in 1961-1962. His approach, detailed in a memoir, highlights the importance of neutral facilitation, logistical support, and maintaining the rhythm of negotiations. Long's emphasis on explaining statements, avoiding over-negotiation, and building confidence between parties showcases the key qualities of a successful mediator. Ultimately, Long's ability to fade into the background after enabling a successful negotiation process demonstrates the true mark of his effectiveness as an intermediary.