Yellow banner with pen and letters

Author: Patrick Furrer

Science Diplomacy for Open Science


This question carries the three dimensions of Science Diplomacy. First, introducing this new element within the NCP system would have a very important impact on ‘science in diplomacy’. Especially with the advent of the UNESCO Open Science recommendation, such a measure would allow the strengthening of the involvement of the scientific community in developing national policies in response to these recommendations. 

Note: This article is a part of the publication ‘Science diplomacy capacity development: Reflections on Diplo’s 2021 course and the road ahead’

Science Diplomacy applies to my own work establishing the national Open Science program 2021-2024 in Switzerland during the last 4 years. I have been collaborating within the Council of National Open Science Coordinators (launched in 2019), which is a typical example of ‘boundary spanning’ within an informal network around Europe. For instance, some members of this network are engaged within ministries in their home countries, whereas in Switzerland the representatives are swiss universities (the swiss national rectors conference) and the Swiss National Science Foundation. 

The question of ‘officializing’ this network appeared during our first informal meeting in Finland in 2019, where the council was kicked off and its first committee elected. The European Commission representative for Open Science attended this first informal meeting too. I took that opportunity to ask him whether the establishment of a ‘National Contact Points (NCP) for Open Science’ was on the agenda of the European Commission for Horizon Europe. The EC has established a system of NCPs for different thematic areas as well as transversal issues (Legal NCP) a long time ago, and has developed it over time mostly on transversal dimensions (e.g. for Marie-Sklodowska-Curie Actions or for European Research Council). Extending this network by officializing an ‘Open Science NCP’ would have strengthened the role of the EU as leading the Open Science agenda at a global level.

This question carries the three dimensions of Science Diplomacy. First, introducing this new element within the NCP system would have a very important impact on ‘science in diplomacy’. Especially with the advent of the UNESCO Open Science recommendation, such a measure would allow the strengthening of the involvement of the scientific community in developing national policies in response to these recommendations. 

Once established and funded by the member states and the associated countries, Open Science NCPs would benefit from EC funding to cooperate in a so-called NCP project. Such networks as NCP projects have been instrumental in the past within several scientific disciplines, as NCPs play a key role in supporting the efforts of ‘diplomacy for science’ via cross-linking and cross-fertilizing international scientific cooperation among scientists from all over the world. An example I know well is the Ideal-IST network, in which I was responsible for the Work Package ‘International Cooperation’. In this context, NCPs span boundaries for the European Research Programmes within the EU as well as outside of EU frontiers. 

This network expanded beyond the EU borders, with partners from Ukraine, Belarus, Mexico, India, Morocco, Algeria, and Tunisia, to give just a few examples. Finally, as the Horizon Europe programme now targets SDGs more specifically, for instance within its new so-called ‘Missions’, the establishment of a transversal NCP covering the Open Science agenda would strengthen the dimension of ‘science for diplomacy’.  

Contacting the Swiss scientific attaché in Brussels to share this suggestion would certainly be an action that would contribute to Science Diplomacy. A proactive suggestion coordinated by a country like Switzerland highly interested in joining the list of associated countries would probably be worth envisioning at a diplomatic level. 

As a freelance consultant, supporting researchers writing proposals for Horizon Europe, I am in a position to influence them (and to relay this influence within my own consultancy network) directly in the future with regard to the necessity to imply Science Diplomacy in their dissemination and communication strategies, to strengthen the key impacts of their project results. Cooperating in the future with GESDA and GSPI would also allow such impacts to scale-up, and to boost my motivation and promote my expertise in scientific integrity and open science practices at an international level.

You may also be interested in


Knowledge management in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Malta

In this paper, Maltese diplomat Gaetan Naudi explains how the Maltese MFA embraced the changes introduced by the informatics era. He looks at such changes from a business management perspective, to show how ICTs were introduced to such a fairly large organisation, the concerns raised by the changes, and the progress on computerised knowledge management. He concludes that despite the positive changes introduced thanks to ICTs, this would not have been possible without human involvement.


DiploDialogue – Metaphors for Diplomats

On Diplo’s blog, in Diplo’s classrooms, and at Diplo’s events, dialogues stretch over a series of entries, comments, and exchanges and may even linger. DiploDialogue summarises. It’s like in sports events: DiploDialogue aims to bring focus by deleting what, in hindsight, is less relevant. In this first DiploDialogue, Katharina Höne and Aldo Matteucci discuss the usefulness of analogies and metaphors for understanding international relations and diplomacy.


The role of knowledge in the cyber-age of globalisation

In his paper, Richard Falk reflects on the application of information technology on diplomacy, and discusses the challenge of converting information technology to ‘knowledge technology’, and subsequently to ‘wisdom technology’. Yet, the ‘crossroads in human experience’ brings many challenges and dangers which the author analyses.


Knowledge management and change in international organisations: Learning from the private sector

In this paper, John Harper and Jennifer Cassingena Harper talk about knowledge as a vital resource, and the necessity of building competencies and establishing new skills. Analysing the theories by Ernst B. Haas in When Knowledge is Power: Three Models of Change in International Organisation, the authors trace the development of knowledge-oriented activities in the private sector, and its implications for organisations in the public and international domain.


Knowledge management and diplomatic training – new approaches for training institutions

Dietrich Kappeler analyses the new approaches for training institutions in knowledge management and diplomatic training, departing from the premise that a distinction is important between personal characteristics and qualities of the diplomat on one hand, and the knowledge and skills he needs to do his job on the other.


Science diplomacy capacity development

Diplo has a track record of more than 20 years of capacity development in diplomacy. Given the increasing relevance of science diplomacy, expanding our program to include aspects of its theory and practice felt like an organic development. We offered our ten-week Science Diplomacy course for the first time in October 2021.


Science & Diplomacy: How countries interact with the Boston innovation ecosystem

Crucial global topics are becoming increasingly dependent on the world’s rapidly changing scientific knowledge and technological capabilities: from global health to digital society, sustainability to development, and beyond. To tackle this growing complexity, countries increasingly seek to engage with international science and technology hubs like Boston, so as to accelerate their ability to innovate and spark collaborative efforts with other nations.


Knowledge and Diplomacy – Alex Sceberras Trigona

In his paper, Alex Sceberras Trigona stresses the importance of the diplomatic document as a primary source of diplomatic knowledge, in the light of the distinction between ‘information’ (can be recorded) and knowledge (not easily recorded), the flow of knowledge as information. He then explains the need for dissecting diplomatic documents, and the various level of analysis which are possible, and the effects of digitalisation on knowledge, information and diplomacy.


Knowledge and Diplomacy

Knowledge and Diplomacy presents papers on knowledge and knowledge management from the January 1999 Conference on Knowledge and Diplomacy in Malta. The papers in this book, examining the topic from a variety of backgrounds, academic interests and orientations, reflect the multidisciplinary character of knowledge management. This publication is only available online.


Knowledge management and international development – the role of diplomacy

In this chapter, Walter Fust talks about the role of knowledge management, and knowledge for development, in diplomacy. He describes various methods to assess what knowledge should be stocked, and explains the need for managers who are assigned the task of deciding what should be stocked. These decisions need to be guided by principles, or guidelines - referred to as value management.


How do you know what you think you know?

In his paper, J. Thomas Converse focuses on four records-related areas where the issues of knowledge management and diplomacy come together and provide the greatest challenges to archivists, diplomats, historians and technology providers: validation, trustworthiness, context and longevity. He also explores some of the changes and challenges brought about by technology, and urges for a continued embrace of technology, while at the same time demanding the validating and relational functions which give archives their trustworthiness.


Knowledge management and diplomacy

In this paper we aim to provide a comprehensive introduction to the topic of knowledge management in diplomacy. First we provide working definitions of knowledge and knowledge management, and examine the evolution of the concepts. Next, we consider specific features of diplomacy that affect and limit the way knowledge management can be implemented. Then we look at specific techniques which diplomacy can adapt from the business sector in the field of knowledge management. Finally, we consider some important questions related to human resources and knowledge management.


Knowledge management: experience from international organisations

In this chapter, John Pace decribes the three-phase evolution of knowledge management in the human rights program of the United Nations. The realisation that knowledge management is a necessity came during the third phase. The author also describes the complex system of monitoring bodies and ad hoc mechanisms, and the developments that took place following four decisions taken in the mid-eighties.


Beyond diplomatic – the unravelling of history

In his paper, Robert Alston travels through time to rekindle an important highlight – as well as a personal highlight – in the history of knowledge management. His journey takes him back to the 1850s, which saw Antonio Panizzi’s efforts in creating a universal repository of knowledge in the British Museum; and to the 1990s, a time in which he acquired first-hand experience at the same museum, drawing conclusions on the various available ways of navigating large bibliographical and archival databases.