Yellow banner with pen and letters

Author: Levi Helm

Science as a process


Science is a systematic process for understanding the world. Diplomacy is a process of interaction and negotiation between states. Both are necessary for addressing sustainable development, but how?

Note: This article is a part of the publication ‘Science diplomacy capacity development: Reflections on Diplo’s 2021 course and the road ahead’

My journey to becoming a scientist started, like many, with curiosity. I wanted to understand how the world worked and I naively believed that if I could understand, then I could make the world a better place. The world is, however,  a bit more complex than that. Simply knowing something is only part of the way to a solution. We may ‘know’ that deforestation is occurring at a rapid rate, but how do we solve this? We may ‘know’ that climate change is occurring, but who should pay the costs to mitigate it? 

With this more nuanced realization, I began to explore science policy and Science Diplomacy as potential career paths after my PhD. Over the past year, I have been fortunate to work with Diplo to develop a module for their new course on Science Diplomacy with a focus on sustainable development. 

To me, the central challenge of creating the course was communicating science in a way that is useful for diplomatic practitioners. Science is a systematic process for understanding the world. Diplomacy is a process of interaction and negotiation between states. Both are necessary for addressing sustainable development, but how? 

When scientists practice science, they are often interested in the claims being made, and the evidence for those claims. Does the evidence match the conclusion proposed by the scientists? Scientists are interested in the assumptions that go into the research, and how they affect the final conclusions. This is how I have been trained to think like a scientist, and it is an incredibly valuable skill – for a scientist. Diplomacy, however, requires other skills. Knowing the quality of the research, and the strength of the conclusions can tell me how good the information is, but it tells me nothing about what I should do about it. Scientists could provide estimates about what could happen in the future, but which scenario is the most desirable is a matter of values. 

I found that in my initial attempts to create the module, I focused on teaching science like a scientist – the theories behind what we know – but I quickly found that this was not working. Knowing all the scientific minutiae that are used to produce information would just put diplomats in the same position as scientists: knowing information, but not being able to act on that information. The other end of the spectrum would be to only teach the conclusions, to teach diplomats a collection of scientific trivia about the world. But this is also problematic. For sustainability, there often isn’t just one scientific answer, as different scientists with different perspectives reach different conclusions. 

In my module, I decided not to discuss what science does, or provide a collection of scientific trivia. Instead, I discussed the process of science, and then what diplomacy can do with the information produced by said process. So, instead of listing information that we learned from science, to discuss science as a process of producing information. To me, this distinction matters. 

If we are to make progress on sustainable development, we need to be able to measure that progress – this is a matter of science. Diplomacy practitioners do not need to know exactly how these measurements are made. They do, however, need to know the implications of what they mean (and what they do not mean). I hope this more nuanced perspective can lead to just and equitable science-based diplomacy in the future. 

Apart from the intellectual joy of creating the course, I also personally enjoyed the collaboration, and I am inspired to keep working at the intersection of science and diplomacy as I further my career!

You may also be interested in


DiploDialogue – Metaphors for Diplomats

On Diplo’s blog, in Diplo’s classrooms, and at Diplo’s events, dialogues stretch over a series of entries, comments, and exchanges and may even linger. DiploDialogue summarises. It’s like in sports events: DiploDialogue aims to bring focus by deleting what, in hindsight, is less relevant. In this first DiploDialogue, Katharina Höne and Aldo Matteucci discuss the usefulness of analogies and metaphors for understanding international relations and diplomacy.


Knowledge management and change in international organisations: Learning from the private sector

In this paper, John Harper and Jennifer Cassingena Harper talk about knowledge as a vital resource, and the necessity of building competencies and establishing new skills. Analysing the theories by Ernst B. Haas in When Knowledge is Power: Three Models of Change in International Organisation, the authors trace the development of knowledge-oriented activities in the private sector, and its implications for organisations in the public and international domain.


Science diplomacy capacity development

Diplo has a track record of more than 20 years of capacity development in diplomacy. Given the increasing relevance of science diplomacy, expanding our program to include aspects of its theory and practice felt like an organic development. We offered our ten-week Science Diplomacy course for the first time in October 2021.


Science & Diplomacy: How countries interact with the Boston innovation ecosystem

Crucial global topics are becoming increasingly dependent on the world’s rapidly changing scientific knowledge and technological capabilities: from global health to digital society, sustainability to development, and beyond. To tackle this growing complexity, countries increasingly seek to engage with international science and technology hubs like Boston, so as to accelerate their ability to innovate and spark collaborative efforts with other nations.


How do you know what you think you know?

In his paper, J. Thomas Converse focuses on four records-related areas where the issues of knowledge management and diplomacy come together and provide the greatest challenges to archivists, diplomats, historians and technology providers: validation, trustworthiness, context and longevity. He also explores some of the changes and challenges brought about by technology, and urges for a continued embrace of technology, while at the same time demanding the validating and relational functions which give archives their trustworthiness.


The role of knowledge in the cyber-age of globalisation

In his paper, Richard Falk reflects on the application of information technology on diplomacy, and discusses the challenge of converting information technology to ‘knowledge technology’, and subsequently to ‘wisdom technology’. Yet, the ‘crossroads in human experience’ brings many challenges and dangers which the author analyses.


Knowledge management and diplomacy

In this paper we aim to provide a comprehensive introduction to the topic of knowledge management in diplomacy. First we provide working definitions of knowledge and knowledge management, and examine the evolution of the concepts. Next, we consider specific features of diplomacy that affect and limit the way knowledge management can be implemented. Then we look at specific techniques which diplomacy can adapt from the business sector in the field of knowledge management. Finally, we consider some important questions related to human resources and knowledge management.


Beyond diplomatic – the unravelling of history

In his paper, Robert Alston travels through time to rekindle an important highlight – as well as a personal highlight – in the history of knowledge management. His journey takes him back to the 1850s, which saw Antonio Panizzi’s efforts in creating a universal repository of knowledge in the British Museum; and to the 1990s, a time in which he acquired first-hand experience at the same museum, drawing conclusions on the various available ways of navigating large bibliographical and archival databases.


Knowledge management: experience from international organisations

In this chapter, John Pace decribes the three-phase evolution of knowledge management in the human rights program of the United Nations. The realisation that knowledge management is a necessity came during the third phase. The author also describes the complex system of monitoring bodies and ad hoc mechanisms, and the developments that took place following four decisions taken in the mid-eighties.


Knowledge management in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Malta

In this paper, Maltese diplomat Gaetan Naudi explains how the Maltese MFA embraced the changes introduced by the informatics era. He looks at such changes from a business management perspective, to show how ICTs were introduced to such a fairly large organisation, the concerns raised by the changes, and the progress on computerised knowledge management. He concludes that despite the positive changes introduced thanks to ICTs, this would not have been possible without human involvement.


Knowledge management and international development – the role of diplomacy

In this chapter, Walter Fust talks about the role of knowledge management, and knowledge for development, in diplomacy. He describes various methods to assess what knowledge should be stocked, and explains the need for managers who are assigned the task of deciding what should be stocked. These decisions need to be guided by principles, or guidelines - referred to as value management.


Knowledge management and diplomatic training – new approaches for training institutions

Dietrich Kappeler analyses the new approaches for training institutions in knowledge management and diplomatic training, departing from the premise that a distinction is important between personal characteristics and qualities of the diplomat on one hand, and the knowledge and skills he needs to do his job on the other.


Knowledge and Diplomacy

Knowledge and Diplomacy presents papers on knowledge and knowledge management from the January 1999 Conference on Knowledge and Diplomacy in Malta. The papers in this book, examining the topic from a variety of backgrounds, academic interests and orientations, reflect the multidisciplinary character of knowledge management. This publication is only available online.


Knowledge and Diplomacy – Alex Sceberras Trigona

In his paper, Alex Sceberras Trigona stresses the importance of the diplomatic document as a primary source of diplomatic knowledge, in the light of the distinction between ‘information’ (can be recorded) and knowledge (not easily recorded), the flow of knowledge as information. He then explains the need for dissecting diplomatic documents, and the various level of analysis which are possible, and the effects of digitalisation on knowledge, information and diplomacy.