 |
This
is the basic document of the OAU. It has been the cornerstone
of the international legal system in Africa. |
| |
 |
| |
Although
the OAU Charter was clearly intended to be read in conjunction
with the
United Nations Charter, and the Universal
Declaration of Human Rights, the guarding of human rights
from government abuse was not the motivating impulse behind
the charter. It was inspired by the anti-colonial struggles
of the 1950's; the Union was dedicated primarily to the eradication
of colonialism and the denunciation of abuse of Africans by
non-Africans (monopolies, trade agreements, apartheid). The
OAU through its charter was able to strengthen the anti-colonial
lobby in the United Nations. Through the OAU the emerging African
nations were able to create a political bloc to facilitate intra-African
relations with external powers. However, it was not meant to
question the actions of African governments themselves vis-à-vis
their own populations. |
| |
 |
| |
The
Union's charter places paramount importance on the safeguarding
of sovereignty, territorial integrity, and independence. This
principle, enshrined as one of the fundamental purposes of the
Organisation, was viewed as being essential in order to consolidate
the African states' hard won independence and struggle against
neo-colonialism in all its forms. Yet, the same anti-colonial
sentiments that made the OAU such an effective political body
in the drive toward independence, have been mobilized to suffocate
the human rights potential of the Union. The concept of defending
sovereignty and independence implied non-interference in the
internal affairs of member states. The non-intervention principle
has been the foundation stone of the Union, a sacred rule, which
states have adhered to blindly. This emphasis on sovereignty
has contributed to the reluctance of member states to seriously
coonsider human rights promotion and enforcement. There has
been a persistent unwillingness among member states to criticize
one another in the face of gross human rights abuses. Furthermore,
even in relation to breaches of grave human rights violations
such as genocide, the OAU has been bogged down by the domestic
jurisdiction clause. The OAU Charter facilitated this by not
providing any enforcement mechanism to safeguard its principles.
Rather, it emphasised cooperation among member states and the
peaceful settlement of disputes through negotiation, mediation,
and conciliation. |
| |
 |
| |
Until
very recently, the OAU/AU never condemned a single state for
the ruthless treatment of its people, there were many times
when the OAU turned a blind eye to politically repressive regimes.
Increasing political repression, denial of political choice,
restrictions on freedom of association, and other human rights
violations met with rare murmurs of dissent from within the
OAU. Furthermore, some massive human rights abuses in the context
of armed conflict have drawn muted responses by adjacent states
with OAU approval. |
| |
 |
| |
Firstly,
the non-intervention principle enshrined in the OAU Charter
strongly obstructs the denunciation of human rights abuses carried
out within the internationally recognized borders of states.
Secondly, and maybe more importantly, the OAU has always been
led by heads of state, who have been responsible for massive
human rights violations. Inter-state denunciations on the subject
of human rights violations is not likely in such a context. |
| |
 |
| |
The
main principles and purposes outlined in the charter are as
follows: |
| |
The
following purposes and principles are stated in the OAU Charter
adopted in 1963 in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: |
| |
The
OAU objectives are stated in
article II of the charter as follows:
- To
promote the unity and solidarity of the African States;
- To
co-ordinate and intensify their cooperation and efforts
to achieve a better life for the peoples of Africa;
- To
defend their sovereignty, their territorial integrity and
independence;
- To
eradicate all forms of colonialism from Africa;
- To
promote international cooperation, having due regard to
the Charter of the United Nations and the Universal Declaration
of Human Rights.
|
| |
To
achieve these goals Member States pledged themselves to harmonize
their policies in the following fields:
- Political
and diplomatic cooperation;
- Economic
cooperation, including transport and communication;
- Educational
and cultural cooperation;
- Health,
sanitation, and nutritional cooperation; Scientific and
technical cooperation;
- Cooperation
for defence and security.
|
| |
The
OAU principles are stated in
article II of the charter as follows:
- The
sovereign equality of all Member States;
- Non-interference
in the internal affairs of States;
- Respect
for the sovereignty and territorial integrity of each State
and for its inalienable right to independent existence;
- Peaceful
settlement of disputes by negotiation, mediation, conciliation
or arbitration;
- Unreserved
condemnation in all its forms, of political assassination
as well as of subversive activities on the part of neighboring
States or any other States;
- Absolute
dedication to the total emancipation of the African territories
which are still dependent;
- Affirmation
of a policy of non-alignment with regard to all blocs.
|
| |
 |
| |
In
proclaiming OAU principles and objectives, the Founding Fathers
of the Organisation envisaged clearly a unity "that transcends
ethnicity and national differences." |
| |
 |
| |
For
further information, please refer to the following sites:
- The
African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights: An African
Contribution to the Project on Global Ethics
-
African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights
|