 |
|
FROM
PARALLEL TO DUAL CAREERS: DIPLOMATIC SPOUSES IN THE EUROPEAN CONTEXT - Annabel Hendry
|
|
|
GENERAL SOCIAL SHIFTS
RELEVANT TO DIPLOMATIC SPOUSES
General Social Shifts Relevant To
Diplomatic Spouses
Shifts in overall career patterns and the tendency towards dual career families:
Volumes have been written within the growing literature on the theory of management on
the lines that vertically directed careers for life are a thing of the past and that the
future lies in "portfolio careers" (e.g., Handy 1995; Grigg, 1997). Reading
these texts you often end up with the impression of societies made up of modern
Renaissance men and women, leading lives of utopian variety and flexibility. All this
ought to be very good news for diplomatic spouses. Yet, unfortunately, in many ways this
message filters through in rather negative ways to those within Diplomatic Services and
often becomes translated into the experience of the transformation from a secure job for
life into insecurity, uncertainty, and anxiety as to how to live up to concepts such as
performance pay. This growing insecurity exacerbates the urgency that is often felt for
both partners in a marriage to keep up their careers. Yet, this can be difficult to
achieve. For spouses, who frequently still suffer repeated rejections when they apply for
jobs on the grounds that they have shifted around and changed jobs too often, the vision
of a portfolio career utopia can seem a long way off. This was borne out in a recent Swiss
survey (Schaller, 1995); against 60% of the respondents who worked before their first
posting, only 16% worked on their return and only 22% were able to pursue their chosen
professions. Concern over career prospects was also reflected in a study undertaken by the
Austrians in 1992 (Wille-Romer, 1992); 75% of the respondents who had completed
professional training were not exercising their professions.
In the meantime two main general trends are emerging. The first is towards dual career
couples, with each partner having equal earning potential: in the case of the UK, 70% of
couples have dual incomes (Family Resources Survey, Department of Social Security). A
direct reflection of this is the second trend towards more women entering diplomatic
services and of a resulting increase in the ratio of male to female spouses in our
Associations (the overall percentage of males in all the EU Associations taken together is
now 15%, rising to 37% in the case of Denmark; 25.5% in the case of the Netherlands, and
13% in that of the United Kingdom). The consequence of both these tendencies is that
spouses, more than ever before, want not just jobs, but to pursue their careers. The
growing ratio of male to female spouses represents its own challenges. Although it is
popular to say that male and female spouses present the same problems and face the same
challenges, I think the question is more complex. At present male spouses, and indeed
couples, are far less prepared for the male partner to compromise his career prospects in
order to follow his spouse round the world. In some countries, this is reflected in rising
numbers of unaccompanied married officers at posts (statistics for this are provided in
the Appendix). Male spouses also tend to feel less obliged to participate in the
activities traditionally associated with diplomatic spousehood.
Changes in marriage patterns and in
the nature of the family and household:
The need to take account of the whole family and the way in which this social category
has itself changed is one which is gaining increasing prominence in personnel policies, in
both the private and public sectors.
During the 1997 Conference of the European Union Foreign Affairs Spouses Association
(EUFASA), the Dutch pointed out how partners play a greater role than ever before in
Personnel Department policies. Why this need? First there is the reason of changing
biographies: parents are living longer and needing care; children are remaining dependent
for longer: one of the observations to emerge from the British Diplomatic Spouses
Associations (BDSA) AGM last year was that it is quite often once children have
completed their education that they need the most support from parents, especially when
jobs are scarce and the economic climate uncertain. Second, there are the changing social
structures that surround families. In the EUFASA Conference, the Dutch also pointed to the
trend that nation states in Europe are demanding more and more that people fall back on
their own resources for supporting themselves and others when they are not actually
earning money; one consequence of this is that personal pensions are becoming more and
more indispensable if one wishes to avoid a penurious old age. Third, there are the
choices which people make about how to live their lives. The resulting changes in family
set-ups will inevitably force changes and greater flexibility in personnel policies,
particularly when it comes to considering unmarried partners. Some countries do recognise
unmarried partners as having the same rights as married ones when it comes to allowances
(The Netherlands and Sweden accept both sexes, whilst the European Commission, Finland,
Norway and France accept only heterosexual partners). It is also becoming increasing
practice in the private sector to incorporate unmarried partners into packages providing
for international assignments.
A further change, which might be a result of the relaxation of the rules in some
Services which prohibited marriage to foreigners,(2) is that there
are increasing numbers of foreign born spouses within diplomatic services. In a
questionnaire sent out by the BDSA this year,(3) respondents were
invited to suggest issues which they thought our Association should address in the future.
Of those who made suggestions, the greatest proportion - 10% - mentioned the particular
problems faced by foreign born spouses. In the case of the Austrian study, it was found
that foreign-born spouses suffered particularly from lack of social recognition in
Austria. Finally, of course, we must mention the seemingly ever-rising divorce rates.
Changes Within Diplomacy And Foreign
Services Relevant To Spouses
Amongst the many changes which are taking place within diplomacy, the most relevant to
spouses seem to be:
Multi-lateral diplomacy:
There are a number of ways in which this tendency within diplomacy affects the role of
spouses. First is the muting of the importance placed upon the promotion of national
identity characteristic of bilateral embassies, with all the symbolic and entertainment
aspects of representation that go with this. Taking the example of the EU corps in
Brussels, the whole promotion of the common European ideal tends, if anything, towards the
suppression of national differences. This, plus the fact that officers work according to
punishing schedules and tend to do business over lunches, means that spouses posted there
find themselves free, if they wish, to participate only to a minimal extent in
representational entertaining. In the case of the United Kingdom Permanent Representation
there, it is popular to describe Brussels as "Whitehall with allowances." Whilst
some spouses welcome this, others feel excluded, diminished and isolated.
At another level, the case of the European Union has fostered a significant development
in the form of EUFASA. This yearly conference began in 1988 and is currently in the final
stages of achieving a legal status as an association in its own right, with an aim to
promoting joint action on the part of all Associations of the member states and that of
the European Commission.
The emphasis on producing
"meaner and leaner" Services; increasing overlaps with the private sector; and
increasing use of IT:
All the above trends represent a new rationality penetrating the way in which diplomacy
is conducted, and a stripping down of superfluous expenses and unnecessary entertainment.
This, again, of course affects spouses, insofar as it involves a reduction in some of the
spheres of activity traditionally associated with their position and role at post.
The overall decline in the notion of
"public duty":
This is a subtle and complicated topic, and details can not be entered into here. The
question of the public service ethos question was raised in the recent conference on
"Diplomacy - A Profession in Peril?" last year. One theme was the way in which
many foreign services are importing private sector practices into their management
policies and contracting out certain activities to the private sector. Yet, several
speakers also expressed anxiety over putting at risk such qualities as loyalty, long term
commitment and experience which are central to the continuing effectiveness of foreign
services. In fact, in some Services, including the British, there are signs that loyalty
and long term commitment are currently on the decline. Younger officers do not view entry
into the Service as necessarily a career for life - particularly if this should involve a
sacrifice of their spouses careers.
Shifts in personnel policies:
An important point to stress in the
European context is at that, while spouses are rejecting "traditional" patterns
of incorporation into Foreign Service life, it is becomingly increasingly true that the
questions which preoccupy those in Personnel Management within our Services concerning
recruitment and retention of staff are intimately bound up with precisely those matters
which involve discussion of spouses, partners and families. There is a nice irony here, of
course. Spouses may be beginning to feel like withdrawing, sometimes because of lack of
recognition and/or consideration from their Services, at the same time as they are being
newly appealed to and asked for their opinions.
2.
This cause was suggested to me by Professor Dietrich Kappeler in discussion during this
Conference.
3. The survey asked spouses to
respond to a series of questions concerning their opinions and experiences of their role.
It was undertaken in preparation for a working session during the 1998 EUFASA Conference
on the "Role of The Diplomatic Spouse/Partner in The 21st Century."
|